What happens when you give a microphone to a public school teacher?
That’s not a rhetorical question. I really want to know, because we so rarely let educators speak in any context other than the classroom.
Maybe that’s why it’s so refreshing that MSNBC is hosting “Public Education Forum 2020: Equity and Justice for All”on Saturday, Dec. 14, in my hometown of Pittsburgh.
Public policy is usually made by billionaires who tell their think tanks what to write up and then give it to legislators to vote it into law.
But ask parents, students, community members or – God forbid! – school teachers about what we should do with something as mundane as education!? That’s crazy talk!
Well, the Democrats, at least, are taking it seriously.
The candidates who are expected to attend Saturday’s forum include: Former Vice President Joe Biden; Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana; billionaire businessman Tom Steyer; and Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.
All the presidential candidates who either qualified for the October debate or hold statewide office were invited to attend, according to organizers.
And guess who else will be there?
Somehow your humble edu-blogger got an invite to the party – limited to an audience of about a thousand.
To be honest, I don’t know if I’ll get the chance to actually ask a question. I might spend the whole time listening, but that would be far from wasted.
Forcing candidates to tell educators to their faces what they intend for public schools is a worthwhile endeavor in itself.
But I must be honest – there is a possibility I may get the microphone and have the opportunity to ask something.
So I’ve prepared the following questions – one for each candidate expected to be at the forum:
Your education plan triples the amount of money the federal government spends annually on low-income schools from about $16 billion to about $48 billion. That money is supposed to go to raising teachers’ salaries, Pre-K, and “more rigorous coursework.” My question is this: will you tie federal spending to standardized testing, Common Core and school privatization initiatives like your former boss Barack Obama did, and how does your position differ from Race to the Top and Obama’s other top down corporate education reforms?
You are infamous for taking money from some terrible people who want to destroy public schools – Reed Hastings, for example, the billionaire founder of Netflix, who wants to replace authentic public schools with charter-schools so that all schools are run by corporations and not elected school boards. Hastings has hosted fundraisers for you. He set aside $100 million to promote the privatization of public schools by charter-school expansion as well as served on the California State Board of Education, where he used his influence to minimize any regulation of charters. My question to you is this: how are any of us to take you seriously when you allow yourself to be bought and sold by the school privatization industry? How can we believe a thing you say when your vote has so obviously been up for sale to the highest bidder?
You’ve said that you support national testing standards and that schools should be held to the highest benchmarks. You’ve also said you’ll work to help schools better measure comprehensive achievement. My question is this: how much and in what ways does your education policy differ from the reductive and corporate-driven policies of Barack Obama and George W. Bush? Would you continue to use biased and unscientific standardized assessments to measure student learningand then hold schools responsible for scores predicated on economic inequality and white supremacy?
Along with Sen. Warren, you have one of the most progressive and comprehensive education plans of any candidate running in 2020. In fact, it’s one of the best any candidate who has sought the Democratic nomination has ever put forward. However, the weakest part of your plan concerns standardized testing. As recently as 2015, you voted to keep the same test and punish bogus accountability initiatives as Barack Obama and George W. Bush. My question is this: what happened to change your mind and would you please explain if and exactly how high stakes standardized testing fits in with your education policies?
Along with Sen. Sanders, you have one of the most progressive and comprehensive education plans of any candidate running in 2020. In fact, it’s one of the best of any candidate who has ever sought the Democratic nomination. However, you seem to equivocate on standardized testing and national academic standards. On the one hand, you say that you’re against high stakes testing, but on the other you speak about putting an emphasis on student careers, and aligning high school graduation requirements with that of colleges. You even say you’d direct “the Department of Education to issue guidance on how schools can leverage existing federal programs to facilitate education-to-workforce preparedness.” This sounds a lot like Barack Obama’s Race to the Top which held school funding hostage to regressive reforms and Common Core which used standardized tests to determine what would be taught in schools. My question is this: please explain exactly if and exactly how high stakes standardized testing and Common Core fit in with your education policies?
Your campaign Website takes no stand on many issues important to educators, families and students including charter schools and standardized testing. Yet you’re a hedge fund billionaire who has donated at least $100,000 through your foundation to Teach for America in 2009. My question is this: what is your position on these policies – standardized testing, charter schools and Teach for America? Do you still think that a few weeks of a crash course is equal to a full teaching degree? Do you still think we need fake temporary teachers who are only committed to the classroom for a few years? Or is it better to have teaching be a respected vocation with highly educated and valued professionals?
Finally, here’s a question I could ask to any and all of the candidates:
I want to ask you about charter schools. Why do we need them at all? Why do we need schools that are publicly funded but privately run? Shouldn’t public schools that accept public money have to accept public administration – elected school boards, transparency and accountability? Shouldn’t all public schools be required to accept all student who live in their coverage areas and not be allowed to cherry pick students? Wouldn’t it be better to close all charter schools that can’t meet the same requirements as authentic public schools and transition those that can to becoming fully public schools?
Well, those are my questions.
If anyone has any other suggestions, please post them in the comments. And if someone else this weekend or later in the campaign season happens to get a chance to query one of the candidates, feel free to use one or all of what I have compiled here.
My hope is that this interest in education isn’t just a political stunt but will translate to better school policies no matter who wins the election in 2020.
Livestream the education forum here on Saturday, Dec. 14, beginning at 9:45 am.
Like this post? I’ve written a book, “Gadfly on the Wall: A Public School Teacher Speaks Out on Racism and Reform,” now available from Garn Press. Ten percent of the proceeds go to the Badass Teachers Association. Check it out!
15 thoughts on “Public School Teacher Questions for 2020 Dem Presidential Candidates”
Excellent questions. Hope you get the opportunity to ask one or more of the candidates about their views.
Thanks, Dave. Here’s hoping.
I am so glad you were selected to attend this educational forum with the Presidential candidates. I told many colleagues that I had hoped you would be selected.
I was able to participate in the Town Meeting last night with Nancy Pelosi and Randi. No one mentioned the ridiculous amount of testing our students are forced to take in the public schools, the developmentally inappropriate curricula, and the lack of teacher input in decision making. As a former kindergarten teacher, I am appalled that play has been outlawed in many kindergarten classrooms across the country.
I know there are many issues affecting public education. I just hope teachers will be heard and policy makers will respond to the needs of our children.
Thanks so much, Judy. I’ve never been to anything like this, so I’m not sure what to expect. Fingers crossed.
Good questions. Journey For Justice is gonna be at the forum in force and we’re having a watch party in Oakland CA.
I love Journey For Justice. I hope to see many other incredible activists in Pittsburgh on Saturday.
These are great questions, custom-tailored. I look forward to watching.
In my experience with Town Halls and Q & A sessions with candidates, going all the way back to the Reagan era, what folks are mostly looking for is the sound bite. The sound bites get crystallized and repeated, but don’t lead to any policy change. Most education policy is (rightfully) crafted at state and local levels. The fed’s role (rightfully) is around equity and perhaps economies of scale (developing materials that everyone can use, for example)–which is why teachers in states that historically have not pursued equity (deep red states, for ex) are fearful of losing federal interventions.
Any candidate who pretends (or, worse, believes) that federal policy making could/should transform public education is probably just looking for that campaign soundbite. Ed policy in Wyoming really should be different from ed policy in Manhattan. Perhaps the most important thing a POTUS could do is fully support public education, express a belief that we are still best off with high-quality, locally controlled schools.
Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Nancy. I suppose that’s all I really want – a federal government that supports education and the rights of districts to local control. But that not nothing.
[…] Here are his questions for the candidates. […]
Excellent questions, do everything you can to ask them. Send them to each candidate and ask for a reply after the meeting so you can push them to go on record. Also needed here–a question on class size, the most important issue for student learning is first of course poverty/social class, then comes class size. Keep going!
Go get ‘em, Steve!
If you get a chance here’s what I want to know: Standardized testing reforms have been empirically measured to narrow the curriculum, in an era where that makes students less competitive for the modern job market. What role do you believe the arts, social studies, and foreign language play in the curriculum and how would you support reintegration of these subjects as valued parts of education?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great question, Tina. I’ll try.
[…] was billed as the MSNBC “Public Education Forum 2020: Equity and Justice for All” – and though it’s over now, its effects may be felt for months or years yet to […]
[…] such far right radicalism didn’t result in an invitation to last weekend’s Education Forum in Pittsburgh for candidates seeking the Democratic 2020 Presidential […]