Who Will Protect My Right NOT to Pay for Your Child’s Religious Education?

Image: Supreme Court Hears Montana State Tax Credit Case

 

 

When I was a kid back in middle school, I had a crush on this girl, let’s call her Patty.

 

 

She wasn’t the most popular or beautiful girl in class, but I kinda’ liked her.

 

 

 

Of course, she had no idea I was alive.

 

 

Or so I thought, until one day she walked straight up to my desk and started rubbing my hair.

 

 

I was shocked at first, but then I just closed my eyes and went with it.

 

 

 

I remember the soft caress of her fingers in my mop of curls. She seemed to massage every inch of my scalp. Then she asked, “Where are they?”

 

 

“Where are what?” I asked.

 

 

“Your horns,” she said. “I want to see your horns.”

 

 

“What?” I said. “I don’t have any horns.”

 

 

“Of course you do,” she said. “My pastor said all you Jews have horns but you hide them in your hair. I want to see them.”

 

 

I had never even heard that bit of anti-Semitism before Patty. But I knew when I was being ridiculed.

 

 

The laughter. The embarrassment. I think I asked to go to the bathroom and stayed until the class was over.

 

 

 

Why bring up such childhood trauma?

 

 

It has baring on a case before the US Supreme Court this week –  Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.

 

 

Three women are suing the state of Montana for refusing to pay for their kids to attend religious schools through a defunct voucher program.

 

 

Backing the effort are far right figures and groups like The Cato Institute, The Council for American Private Education, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, former Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and the Center for Education Reform – all of which have filed Amici Curiae briefs arguing that prohibiting religious schools from getting public money is somehow a violation of the First Amendment.

 

 

If successful, the case would open the door to publicly-funded private religious education across the country – not to mention siphoning much-needed money away from the public schools.

 

 

It’s bad enough that kids learn prejudicial lies from the pulpit and parochial schools. It’s worse if the victims of such prejudice have to pay for their tormentors to be thus indoctrinated.

 

 

In the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom of 1779, Thomas Jefferson wrote “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical . . . ”

 

 

I agree. That is sinful and tyrannical. Especially if those abhorrent beliefs lead to actions detrimental to the health and well-being of those being forced to pay for just such ignorance to be renewed in yet another generation.

 

 

The incident with Patty wasn’t the first or last time I suffered through religious persecution. I went to public school but the worst torment usually came from kids who had a year or two of parochial education.

 

 

For example, I can’t tell you how many times classmates asked me why I killed Jesus.

 

 

Now I’m a middle school teacher, myself.

 

 

I do my best to foster understanding and acceptance of all peoples no matter their race, gender, orientation or creed.

 

 

That doesn’t mean I squash religious discussion or opinions, either.

 

 

Kids are allowed to think and say what they choose. If they want to pray or express a religious belief, that’s fine so long as they don’t hurt others.

 

 

Though radical right ideologues decry the loss of religion in public schools, all that really means is that the adults don’t get to express their theologies. The kids have never been thus encumbered.

 

 

Even so, religious ignorance is never far away.

 

 

 

Every year before I teach “The Diary of Anne Frank” I go over the history of the Holocaust.

 

 

 

At least one student always raises his or her hand and asks if Hitler was Jewish.

 

 

I patiently explain that he wasn’t, but they insist that he must have been. After all, Father Such-And-Such said it, so it must be true.

 

 

And this is the kind of nonsense that is often taught as fact at parochial schools.

 

 

Private religious institutions are infamous for revisionist history and denying climate science. What’s less well-known is how they often try to normalize racist attitudes.

 

 

The American Christian Education (ACE) organization provides fundamentalist school curriculum to thousands of religious schools throughout the country. Included in this curriculum is the A Beka Book and Bob Jones University Press textbooks. A Beka publishers, in particular, reported that about 9,000 schools nationwide purchase their textbooks.

 

 

In their pages you’ll find glowing descriptions of the Ku Klux Klan, how the massacre of Native Americans saved many souls, African slaves had really good lives, homosexuals are no better than rapists and child molesters, and progressive attempts at equal rights such as Brown vs. Board of Education were illegal and misguided. You know – all the greatest Donald Trump campaign hits!

 

 

Today these claims are uncritically being taught to children at schools receiving school vouchers. We’re using public money to increase the racism and prejudice in the next generation.

 

 

In any sane country, a case like Espinoza would be about stopping such nonsense! But the plaintiffs and their billionaire backers actually want to EXPAND IT!

 

 

The goal is to destroy facts and promote ignorance. That requires the destruction of public schools.

 

 

Kyle Olson said as much in a 2018 op-ed for National School Choice Week – a bit of propaganda he helped create in 2011 through his lobbying firm, the Education Action Group. In fact, he credited Jesus, himself, with anti-public school venom.

 

Olson wrote:

 

“I would like to think that, yes, Jesus would destroy the public education temple and save the children from despair and a hopeless future.”

 

 

These are the folks complaining that public tax dollars aren’t being allowed to fund parochial schools everywhere and where they are allowed to bankroll such schools they aren’t being allowed to do so enough.

 

 

Technically, the First Amendment doesn’t allow the government to support religious schools.

 

 

But the Espinoza crowd think that laundering the money through Tax Credit Scholarships somehow makes it all okay. A business or rich donor hands money to families to send their kids to private schools. Except that money makes a stop at a “scholarship” organization first, and the donors get to deduct their contributions from their taxes. Blogger Peter Greene tells us to think of it like this:

 

 

“I’m the state, and you owe me $100. I am not allowed to gamble, but if you give that $100 to my bookie instead, I’ll consider us square.”

 

 

It’s a shell game that pretends spending tax money before it gets deposited in the government’s account frees our public servants from following the rules.

 

 

I don’t care where it’s been, that’s my money as good as if you took it from my wallet because it’s money owed to me and every other taxpayer. That money is owed to the public good, not some ideologue’s Sunday school project, and its absence means I have to pay more to fund things we all need like police, firefighters, public transportation, and public schools.

 

 

They’re right about one thing. This is an issue of religious freedom, but it’s not about their freedom. It’s about MY freedom not to support their beliefs.

 

 

I say – let them believe what they will. It’s their choice, and they have the right to subject their children to it if they want.

 

 

But leave me out of it.

 

 

Don’t expect me to foot the bill.

 

 

I’m rightly compelled to pay for public education because it benefits everyone. It creates an educated populace capable of keeping the lights on. It creates people who know enough about the world that they can make knowledgeable decisions and vote for good leaders.

 

 

But parochial schools are exclusionary by design. Spreading their ignorance does not benefit society. It hurts it.

 

 

We talk a lot about the First Amendment, but we seem to forget what it actually says:

 

 

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”

 

 

That should be our guiding principle – religious freedom.

 

 

Let people practice their faiths however they see fit.

 

 

But respect my freedom from religion as much as I respect your freedom of it.


 

Like this post? I’ve written a book, “Gadfly on the Wall: A Public School Teacher Speaks Out on Racism and Reform,” now available from Garn Press. Ten percent of the proceeds go to the Badass Teachers Association. Check it out!

book-3

16 thoughts on “Who Will Protect My Right NOT to Pay for Your Child’s Religious Education?

  1. “religious ignorance is never far away”

    TRUE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I do not run into religious ignorance every day but I do, A LOT!

    That’s why I do not trust religions. If I want to know what the Bible has to say about an issue, I’ll find an answer without asking some religion to tell me what it is.

    Any individual that allows religion to tell them what to think is probably going to die twice and the 2nd time, their soul will die, too.

    Like

    • Bluecat57, in what way am I immoral? Is it because I was born and raised Jewish? Is it because I take offense at anti-Semitic stereotypes? Is it because I value science and facts over dogma? Is it because I don’t think children should be indoctrinated into a political ideology with public tax money? And in what way have I indoctrinated anyone? I thought I was being pretty fair here. I wrote that people should be free to believe what they want – just don’t make me pay for it. If that’s an immoral position, then I guess I am guilty.

      Like

      • I wasn’t speaking to “you”, I was speaking to the Leftist education system in general.

        YOU are not “immoral” for being Jewish. Immorality is all the cr@p they are teaching kids that is NOT Reading, wRiting or aRithmetic.(I like to add Rhetoric which is part of a Classical Education)

        I am advocating for NO government funding for anyone’s education. Education is NOT a proper function of government.

        Sorry for the confusion.

        Like

      • Bluecat57, thank you for clarifying your view. But public schools do not teach immoral crap. Do you oppose gym class, social studies, science, foreign language, art, music? These are not immoral subjects nor are they indoctrination. If a public school teacher were teaching opinions (faith based curriculum), he or she could be fired. If a parochial teacher were teaching faith based content, that would just be an expected part of the lesson plan. That’s the difference.

        We need a society where everyone knows the basics about science, history, math and reading. We need people to be able to think critically so that they can make good decisions and vote for competent leaders. That’s the purpose of education as our founders saw it. That’s a concept we would do well to support today.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bluecat57, I was a public school teacher for thirty years (1975 – 2005), and I can assure you that I did not teach the six to seven thousand students I taught during those years the “leftist crap” you refer to.

        The public education system in the United States represents the country. About a third of the public school teachers are registered Republicans and some of them voted for Donald Trump. I know two public school teachers that are still teaching and they are Trump supporters.

        I was a registered independent when I was a teacher. There are also registered Democarrtis that teach. I knew only one teacher that held liberal beliefs and I know for a fact that he didn’t preach his political thinking to influence his students. Maybe he wanted to, but teachers were not allowed to do that. Start preaching any political “crap” and that is going to cause complaints from students and parents.

        Why? Because in every classroom, the students also represent the entire political-religious spectrum and if a liberal attempted to influence the thinking of a student from a conservative family, the parents were going to complain.

        Most of the teachers were conservative in their thinking but not Alt-Right conservatives that blame every conspiracy theory on “liberals”.

        I did not know ONE teacher that spouted “liberal” crap to brainwash their students. None of us had time to stand behind a bully pulpit and spread our political and religious thinking. We were too busy teaching reading, writing, science, and math to do that.

        I worked 60 to100 hours a week and that included teaching, planning lessons, correcting student work and calling parents, and NOT ONE minute was used to spout political “CRAP”, left, middle or right. I did not have the time or luxury for that.

        Liked by 1 person

    • How dare you judge someone else as immoral based on your prejudices.

      You have no right to expect me or anyone else to pay taxes to pay for your child’s religious indoctrination.

      If you want to shelter your children from the world, then lock them to a chain attached to your house and home teach them.

      When I read comments like yours, I want Donald Trump to have the Civil War he wants so he can hold onto power for the rest of his life. Because that alleged Civil War will not be a slam dunk like Trump and his ignorant supporters think.

      Thomas Jefferson said we should nourish the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants (Donald Trump and his hardcore followers) and the rest of us, the patriots.

      One thing I have learned in the last 74+ years is to NOT trust religions.

      Like

  2. Already happening in Indiana. Legislators tout to the public how much money is going to K-12 education. Always missing is the word PUBLIC.

    Like

    • It’s happening in a limited way in my home state of Pennsylvania, too, through Tax Credit Scholarships. But if Espinoza is successful, it could open the floodgates for this to happen wide scale everywhere. That’s the issue.

      Like

  3. I believe you made their argument for them, in your quote. If it is repugnant to force someone to financially support a belief they find abhorrent, you have to understand they feel that way about public schooling. If you are able to think of this in a logical way rather than only from your own belief system, it does make sense. They do not take advantage of the public school system, so their hard earned tax money should not be used to support it. Most people simply want the same per pupil funding the public schools are receiving refunded to them to use as they see fit, whether that be home schooling, private schools, or something else entirely, it is their money and their choice. It is not always about religion, many would rather home school because of special needs or dissatisfaction with the pace of the curriculum, etc. I personally love the public schools my children attend, so my tax dollars are supporting their schools. Why shouldn’t my friend who home schooled her son last year be allowed to use her hard earned tax dollars to support that? She isn’t using the school system, so why should she pay for it?

    Like

    • Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Elizabeth. You seem to be referring especially to Jefferson’s statement in the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom of 1779: “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical . . . ”

      Yes, some far right ideologues probably feel the same way about public education. But I add to Jefferson the following idea (which he has also advocated for in different terms):

      “I’m rightly compelled to pay for public education because it benefits everyone. It creates an educated populace capable of keeping the lights on. It creates people who know enough about the world that they can make knowledgeable decisions and vote for good leaders.”

      Public Education is in the interests of the public good. If you find me someone who lives alone in the woods as Thoreau did when he wrote Walden, perhaps that person could logically argue against being taxed to pay for public school. But anyone who lives in society cannot. Yet you can live in society and logically want to be left out of the fruits of parochial schools. Home school doesn’t enter into it really unless it includes religious education, as long as the public isn’t paying for religious instruction,.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.