You can’t be a public school and still ignore the will of the people.
That’s the problem at too many districts across the country where narrow-minded administrators are waging an all out war on parents opting their children out of standardized testing.
The federal government still requires all states to give high stakes tests to public school students in grades 3-8 and once in high school. So states require their districts to give the tests – despite increasing criticism over the assessments’ validity, age appropriateness, racial and economic bias and the very manner in which the scores are used to justify narrowing the curriculum, school privatization, funding cuts, teacher firings and closing buildings serving the most underprivileged children.
In response, parents from coast to coast continue to fight the havoc being forced upon their communities by refusing the tests for their children.
Yet instead of welcoming this rush of familial interest, at some schools we find principals, superintendents and every level of functionary in between doing whatever they can to impede parental will.
Most administrators don’t actually go so far as out right refusal of a parent’s demand to opt out their children.
That’s especially true in states where the right to opt out is codified in the law.
Three states – California, Utah, and Wisconsin – have enacted legislation permitting parents to opt their children out of standardized tests. However, at least five others, including my home of Pennsylvania, have laws respecting parents’ opt-out wishes for certain reasons. In others states there may not be specific legislation permitting it, but none have laws forbidding it either. At worst, test refusal is an act of civil disobedience like tearing down a confederate monument or freedom rides.
In Pennsylvania, the school code specifies that parents can refuse the test for their children for “religious reasons.” Those reasons and the religion in question never need be named. Citing “religious reasons” is rationale enough.
“PA School Code Chapter 4.4(d):
(4) …If upon inspection of a State assessment parents or guardians find the assessment to be in conflict with their religious belief and wish their students to be excused from the assessment, the right of the parents or guardians will not be denied upon written request that states the objection to the applicable school district superintendent, charter school chief executive officer or AVTS director.”
So when a parent provides just such an objection, it’s there in black and white that administrators must comply with that request.
However, some administrators are trying to game the system. When the other students are taking the state standardized test, the opt out students are rounded up and forced instead to take a district created assessment that just so happens to look almost exactly like the test their parents explicitly asked they not be subjected to.
So in my state, some parents have opted their children out of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) or Keystone Exams, but administrators are requiring them instead to take an assessment they cobbled together themselves that closely resembles the PSSA and/or Keystone Exam.
They take a little bit from the PSSA, a bit from the Partnership for Assessment of Reading Readiness for College and Careers (PARRC) test, a question or two from the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and voila! A brand new Frankenstein’s monster of standardized assessment.
But that’s not all. Some districts go one step further. They tie the results of this bogus “district” assessment with class placement. The results of the faux test are used to determine whether students are placed in the remedial, academic or the honors class in a given subject (English Language Arts, Math or Science) in the next grade.
Does that violate the law? Parents did not want their children to be assessed with a standardized test, and that’s exactly what the school did anyway. The only difference is the name of the standardized test they used.
I am not a lawyer, but I’ve contacted several. The answer I’ve gotten is that this may not be technically illegal, but it does at least violate the spirit of the law.
Districts are given a certain latitude to determine their own curriculum and assessments. This kind of runaround is ugly, petty and possibly just on the line of legality.
But our administrators are not done. Not only are they requiring such students to take a cobbled together standardized assessment, when children are done, they are forced to do hours of test prep for the state assessment that their parents refused for them.
Imagine opting out of the PSSA and then being forced to spend that time preparing for that very test. Imagine refusing to allow your children to take the Keystone Exam but then having them forced to prepare for it instead.
Petty, small-minded, punitive and – in this case – possibly illegal.
The school code is specifically against this. From the same section (4.4):
“(d) School entities shall adopt policies to assure that parents or guardians have the following:
(3) …The right to have their children excused from specific instruction that conflicts with their religious beliefs, upon receipt by the school entity of a written request from the parent or guardians.”
Again, I am not a lawyer, but it seems pretty clear that this, at least, is a violation of the law.
They can request their children not be given specific instruction – in this case test prep. Yet that’s exactly what administrators are doing anyway.
So what are opt out parents to do? Should they lawyer up?
Possibly. Though no one likes to have to take their own school to court. Any monetary damages thus recovered come from the collective pot that should go to help all students learn. It’s unfortunate that some administrators play so freely with taxpayer dollars when it would be a simple matter to safeguard them AND respect parental rights.
A better course of action may be for opt out parents in such situations to seek redress directly from the school board.
School directors are elected officials, after all. They may not be appraised of the actions of the administrators in their employ.
And that is really where the buck stops. If school directors don’t approve of this sort of chicanery, they can easily put a stop to it.
These are public schools. They are supposed to be run by the public. Our democracy is supposed to be what defines us. We are run by the people, for the people.
We’re not some charter school where school directors are appointed to their positions, hold their meetings in private and rarely if ever have to account for their decisions.
It’s shocking that in an age when public schools are often set against privatized ones that we’d allow such foolishness.
We need to set ourselves apart. Instead of denying parental requests, we should go out of our way to accommodate them.
Parents could, after all, remove their children and try their luck elsewhere.
At charter schools, they would probably get an even worse welcome. After all, most such schools pride themselves on their test scores and test prep curriculum having kicked out any students who don’t score well.
However, parents of means could enroll their children in private or parochial schools that are not required by law to even take these high stakes tests.
I’m not recommending that course of action. These schools are expensive, restrictive, insular and extremely racially and economically segregated.
But how short sighted must public school administrators be if they play these sorts of games with parents and children in just such an environment?
Any public school leader who wars against opt outs is participating in their own schools demise.
This is doubly so at schools serving high poverty populations.
Children of the poor and minorities historically get lower test scores than those from wealthier families. These tests are used to justify budget cuts and firing school staff – including these administrators.
Opting out of testing is one way to deny this data to the state so that they can’t use it against the school.
Certainly having high numbers of students opting out can, itself, become an excuse for punitive action from the state. But nowhere in the country has it ever actually happened.
State legislatures, too, are run by majority rule. The same with the federal government.
Our lawmakers have no authority to tell voters they can’t opt their children out of testing. It is the voters who are the boss.
We’d all best remember that.
Like this post? I’ve written a book, “Gadfly on the Wall: A Public School Teacher Speaks Out on Racism and Reform,” now available from Garn Press. Ten percent of the proceeds go to the Badass Teachers Association. Check it out!
6 thoughts on “Schools That Hinder Opt Outs Are Participating in Their Own Demise”
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads.
I have to disagree. Our administration has been supportive of us opting out of the PSSAs. We are being held back by the teschers’ union. It is our teachers that want to use the test scores. When I have questioned the use of the PSSAs it is the president who is our jr high guidance office who dictates our students placement into advanced classes. When we questioned administrators, they were trying to figure out how to explain it to the union.
The Keystones are in our teachers contract that dictates our students pass the Keystones to be dueled enrollment for high school and college credit. When I asked about this the union was very upset that I wanted it removed in the new contract.
Take a good look it’s the union. The administration is caught in the middle and is their escape goat
Felicia, I can’t comment specifically on your district since you didn’t name it and I probably know nothing about it. However, nothing gets in a union contract without both parties agreeing to it. If there’s something funky in there, you have recourse to change it through collective bargaining. Second, I can’t imagine why teachers would be so short sighted. If this is happening in your neighborhood, it’s a rarity. You need to educate the teachers why it’s not in their best interests or the best interests of their students or community. Teachers are human beings. They can be wrong, too. Though they rarely come to the conclusion that high stakes testing – which has sparked strikes across the country as well as school closings and the teacher shortage – is somehow in their best interest. That’s like chickens for Col. Sanders!
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
[…] And unlike the PSSA or Keystone Exams – assessments required by the state – administrators are trying to forbid parents from opting their children out of the MAP test. […]
[…] I was asked to send in a letter, sign a confidentiality statement and go to the school to examine the test before they would excuse my little girl from the tests. It was an unnecessary hassle meant to discourage parents from doing what they thought was right and exercis…. […]