
Imagine you’re settling in to enjoy an article on-line or in your favorite print newspaper and you come across this headline:
U.S. Schools Ranked Low Internationally!
Or
Out of X Countries, U.S. Places Far From the Top in Math!
You feel embarrassed.
Soon that embarrassment turns to anger.
Sweat starts to break out on your brow.
And then you start to grasp for a solution to the problem – something major, something to disrupt the current system and bring us back to our proper place in the lead.
TWEEEEEEEET!
That was me blowing a gym teacher’s whistle. I’ll do it again:
TWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
Hold it right there, consumer of corporate media. You’ve just been had by one of the oldest tricks in the book.
It’s the old manipulate-the-data-to-make-it-look-like-there’s-a-crisis-that-can-only-be-solved-by-drastic-measures-that-you-would-never-approve-of-normally.
We also call it disaster capitalism or the shock doctrine.
It’s been used to get people to agree to terrible solutions like preemptive wars of choice, warrantless wiretapping of civilians, torturing prisoners, defunding public health programs and scientific research – just about everything the Koch Brothers, the Waltons, the Broads, Gateses and other billionaire hegemonists have on their fire sale wish list.
In the case of the American educational system, it’s the impetus behind high stakes standardized testing, Common Core, Teach for America, and charter and voucher schools.
And they’re all justified by misinformation about student test scores.
The argument goes like this: Our Kids Are Failing!? Quick! Standardize and Privatize Their Schools!
First, education isn’t a race.
There is no best education system followed by a second best, etc. There are only countries that meet their students needs better than others.
And if you really wanted to determine if our country was meeting student needs, you wouldn’t appeal to test scores. You’d look at specific needs and assess them individually.
But you rarely see that. You rarely see an article with the headline:
U.S. Schools More Segregated Than Any In The Industrialized World!
Or
Out of X Countries, U.S. Spends Most on Rich Students and Least on Poor Ones!
Second, we need to ask ourselves if standardized test scores are really the best way to assess (1) student learning and (2) the education system as a whole.
Multiple choice tests are written by large corporations that profit more off of student failure than success. That’s not exactly an objective measure.
Students are considered passing or failing based on an arbitrary cut score that changes every year. That’s not exactly unbiased.
Moreover, standardized tests are always graded on a curve. That means no matter how well students do, some will always be considered failing. We cannot have No Child Left Behind when our assessments are designed to do just the opposite – it’s logically impossible.
But whenever the media turns to these international rankings, they ignore these facts.
They pretend it’s a horse race and we’re losing.
I kind of expect this from the corporate media. But when so-called progressive writers fall into this trap, I have to wonder if they’re just lazy or ignorant.
At best, these test scores are a second hand indication of structural inequalities in our public education system. It’s no accident that student from wealthy families generally score higher than those from poor ones. Nor is it pure misadventure that minority children also tend to score lower than their white counterparts.
These tests are economically, racially and culturally biased. They are completely unhelpful in determining root causes.
Thankfully, they’re unnecessary. It doesn’t take a standardized test to determine which students are receiving the least funding. Nor does it take a corporate intermediary to show us which schools have the largest class sizes and lowest resources.
The sad fact is that there are an awful lot of poor children attending public school. The U.S. has one of the highest child poverty rates in the industrialized world. And despite spending a lot on our middle class and wealthy students, we’re doing next to nothing to actually help our neediest children.
A large portion of U.S. public schools have been left to their own devices for decades. What’s worse, when they struggle to meet students’ needs, we don’t swoop in with help. We level blame. We fire teachers, close buildings and privatize.
There’s absolutely zero proof that changing a public school to a charter school will help, but we do it anyway. There’s not a scrap of evidence that sending poor kids to a low end private school with a tax-funded voucher will help, but we do it anyway.
Think about it: why would getting rid of duly-elected school boards help kids learn? Why would allowing schools to spend money behind close doors with zero public accountability boost children’s ability to learn?
Yet our policymakers continue to push for these measures because they have no intention of helping poor and minority public school students. They just want to enrich their friends in the school privatization industry. They just want to divert public money to testing corporations and book publishers.
THAT is the problem with America’s education system.
Not test scores.
It’s time our nation’s journalists give up this old canard.
We must be honest about why our public schools struggle. That’s the only way to find real solutions.
We must acknowledge the increasing segregation – both racially and economically. We must acknowledge the blatant funding disparities. And we must acknowledge how the majority of education policy at the federal, state and local level has done little to help alleviate these problems – in fact it has exacerbated them.
We need to stop testing and start investing in our schools. We need to stop privatizing and start participating in our neighborhood schools.
And most of all, we need to stop the lies and disinformation.

[…] public schools are not perfect. They suffer from targeted disinvestment – especially those situated in urban neighborhoods and those serving larger populations of […]
LikeLike
[…] It’s like taking a bath, Scott. You can’t just do it once and be clean for the rest of your life. You need to bathe every day. One-time funding windfalls don’t work. You need equitable and sustainable funding revenues. […]
LikeLike
[…] bottom line: if we really want to improve student academic outcomes in public schools, we need to fully and equitably fund them. We need to abandon school privatization schemes and fully support public schools. And we need to […]
LikeLike
[…] set kids up to succeed or fail before they even enter the school system with an economy that rewards the already rich and punishes generational […]
LikeLike
[…] – for one – am sick of watching my middle school students overstuffed into classrooms with crumbling infrastructure…. I’ll bet there are a lot of teachers and parents who feel the same […]
LikeLike
[…] I’m not saying they’re perfect. In many neighborhoods, they’ve been sabotaged and surgically dismantled, but that’s a problem with an easy solution. Invest in public schools! […]
LikeLike
[…] to high stakes. Instead rely on classroom grades and teacher observations for student assessment. Use indexes and audits of school resources to determine whether they are doing their best to teach s…. […]
LikeLike
[…] -In fact, you know what? Don’t use standardized tests at all to assess student learning – especially not connected to high stakes. Instead rely on classroom grades and teacher observations for student assessment. Use indexes and audits of school resources to determine whether they are doing their best to teach s…. […]
LikeLike
[…] So we’re left with the continued use of widespread standardized testing attached to high stakes for students, schools and t…. […]
LikeLike
[…] can’t raise expectations while taking away resources, union protections, and fair ways to evaluate their […]
LikeLike
[…] take issue with how that observation has been used to support the status quo of test-and-punish and strategic disinvestment in public schools. I take issue with the idea that growth is the ONLY factor in student learning and how we are […]
LikeLike
[…] Ever wonder why schools can’t afford books, buses and nurses? […]
LikeLike
[…] most schools are already doing that – or certainly trying to do that within the confines of their […]
LikeLike
[…] repulsive and selfish as these hackers are, they’re only taking the greed of the testing, privatization and ed tech industry to its logical […]
LikeLike
[…] You lose time with family, children and friends. And no matter how hard you work, you’re given next to no resources to get it done with, your autonomy is stripped away, you’re given mountains of unnecessary bureaucratic paperwork, […]
LikeLike
[…] are engaged in a system of assessment that isn’t concerned with learning so much as weeding people out. It’s not about who knows what, but about which questions to ask […]
LikeLike
[…] WHAT I LIKE: Everything! Our public schools are crumbling under decades of neglect and targeted disinvestment – especially those serving the poor and minorities. This could be a game changer for the […]
LikeLike
[…] If test scores have any meaning at all – it’s parental wealth. Rich kids tend to score higher than poor kids. That’s partially because of the inequality of resources each receive, but also because of racial, cultural and economic bias embedded in the questions. […]
LikeLike
[…] about what this means. We are engaged in a system of assessment that isn’t concerned with learning so much as weeding people out. It’s not about who knows what, but about which questions to ask […]
LikeLike
[…] it has something to do with the differences in services we provide at each elementary school. Maybe it has to do with the resources we allocate to each school. Maybe it has something to do […]
LikeLike
[…] They are putting everything on teachers and students without providing either of us with the tools w…. […]
LikeLike
[…] what does our society do to help these kids catch up with their more privileged peers? It underfunds their schools, subjects them to increased segregation, narrows their curriculum, offers them as prey to charter school charlatans – in short, it adds to their hurtles more than […]
LikeLike
[…] If there had been some legislation specifically enshrining the rights of the underprivileged, however, it is clear this administration would be likewise proposing measures to dispense with it. […]
LikeLike
[…] If lessons have to be cut to essentials, standardized testing and the need for endless test prep should be the first things to go. In fact, students, educators, parents and college professors will tell you how useless these assessments are. They reflect basic economic inequalities and enforce them by tying education funding to the test sco…. […]
LikeLike
[…] continually decry low test scores while applauding every means to increase racial and economic segregation. They push every policy to […]
LikeLike
[…] It should come as no surprise, then, that we deeply under-fund our public schools. […]
LikeLike
[…] Public schools have basically three revenue streams – the federal government, the state and local neighborhood taxpayers. […]
LikeLike
[…] because of (1) economic inequality, and (2) implicit bias in the […]
LikeLike
[…] We don’t need standardized tests! We need resources to help these kids overcome the obstacles set before them or to remove those obsta… […]
LikeLike
[…] Um, we do understand them, Congressman. You don’t need a multiple choice assessment to see who is failing or why. It’s due to targeted disinvestment of the poor and children of color. […]
LikeLike
[…] learning students received wasn’t nearly as comprehensive as our kids routinely expect in even the most under-funded urban public schools today. And special education services was non-existent. Kids with special needs were routinely left out […]
LikeLike
[…] And way to use poor and special needs kids as props to drum up support. Funny how you never seem to care so much about them when issuing budget priorities or school funding… […]
LikeLike
[…] Schools have always struggled to overcome the socioeconomic problems of their students. The only difference is that now we can’t just point to standardized test scores and blame it all on teachers. […]
LikeLike
[…] Equitable funding with schools in higher income communities? The freedom and autonomy to forgo high stakes standardized testing? Not having to compete with charter and voucher schools that get to play by different rules skewered in their favor? […]
LikeLike
[…] even more telling is the fact that this has never happened. Testing has never resulted in more resources being provided to needy children other than providing […]
LikeLike
[…] as a means to identify student needs and provide more resources. Unfortunately, as Singer states, The fact is, that this has never happened. Testing has never resulted in more resources being provided to needy children other than providing […]
LikeLike
[…] Finally, take a look at the resources each school has. How much do they spend per pupil and how does that compare with surrounding districts? Look at how segregated the school is both in comparison to other districts, other schools in the district and class-by-class within the school. Look at class size, how wide or narrow the curriculum is, how robust the extra curricular activities offered, what kind of counseling and tutoring each school offers. That will tell you a lot about how much learning students have achieved – not just during Covid times but ANYTIME! […]
LikeLike
[…] Pennsylvania, as in most states, public schools are primarily funded by local property taxes. So rich communities spend a boatload per student and poor communities scrape together whatever […]
LikeLike
[…] Well, they could reinvest it in our schools. […]
LikeLike
[…] Every child does not receive equitable resources or even close to what they need. […]
LikeLike
[…] claim the US spends more per student than nearly any other country in the developed world. But that figure varies tremendously by state with some spending much more than others. Moreover, American schools have costs educational institutions in other countries don’t have […]
LikeLike
[…] dass die USA mehr pro Student ausgeben als fast jedes andere Land der entwickelten Welt. Aber das Die Zahl variiert stark von Staat zu Staat, wobei einige viel mehr ausgeben als andere. Darüber hinaus haben amerikanische Schulen Kosten, die Bildungseinrichtungen in anderen Ländern […]
LikeLike
[…] put it bluntly – we’re cheap. Especially when it comes to […]
LikeLike
[…] the antidote to such disinformation – a robust public education system – has been stolen from too many Americans by decades of under funding, rampant school privatization and high stakes […]
LikeLike
[…] need you to stand in judgement of them and then brag to your superiors about being a hard ass. They need you to get them the resources necessary – time, salary, lower class size, counselors, anything really that reduces the unnecessary from a […]
LikeLike
[…] military style policing, especially in neighborhoods housing mostly people of color. It’s providing less education funding to schools serving mostly brown and black students than those serving mostly white kids. The people complaining about teaching the history of […]
LikeLike
[…] see the scarcity of resources available to classroom teachers to meet those needs and the profusion of expec…(For example, the expectation of bills like HB 1332 that they post all their curriculum and daily […]
LikeLike
[…] while American society IS unfair to the poor and minorities, several studies indicate that the problem is even deeper than […]
LikeLike
[…] was supposed to increase funding at the neediest schools. Unsurprisingly this did not happen. All it did was further increase the funding gap between rich and poor schools and between wealthy an…. […]
LikeLike
[…] The law also justified its existence with claims to equity. Somehow taking resources away from districts with low test scores was supposed to increase funding at the neediest schools. Unsurprisingly this did not happen. All it did was further increase the funding gap between rich and poor schools and between wealthy an…. […]
LikeLike