The One Reason Bernie Sanders is the Best Mainstream Candidate for Parents and Teachers

It really all comes down to this.

You can talk all day about delegates and superdelegates.

You can talk about polls and electability.

You can talk about political experience, likeability, and authenticity. You can talk about political dynasties, union endorsements and campaign ads. You can talk about how many people show up at who’s rallies and who did what during the Civil Rights movement.

But when push comes to shove, there is one undeniable reason Bernie Sanders is the best mainstream 2016 Presidential candidate: He is running against privatization.

That’s it. Sold.

Everything else is nice. It adds to the appeal, but that one essential reason is enough to tip the scales – knock them over, really – to Bernie’s favor.

America’s parents and teachers are fighting a battle for our children’s schools. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle stand against us. They are giving away the store. They are selling our system of public education – once the envy of the world – to for-profit corporations piece-by-piece.

They are stealing our schools out from under us, giving them to unscrupulous charter school operators who are stripping away services for our children so that they can pad their own bottom line.

And only Bernie truly stands against them.

It’s not about who said what. It doesn’t matter if he slipped up and said something ignorant about “public charter schools.” It doesn’t matter if Hillary Clinton, too, has occasionally criticized charters.

What matters is that standing against privatization is the backbone of the Sanders campaign. It is the bedrock which supports all of his other platforms. It is the foundation of his entire career in politics.

Might he screw it up once in office? Sure. He’s only human. But the odds are in our favor that he’ll actually improve things.

Hillary Clinton is an intelligent, capable politician. She is not the evil witch that the Right paints her to be. However, her campaign is largely supported by the same people who are privatizing our schools. They aren’t giving her all that money for her to act against their interests.

Might she make some compromises that forestall the worst effects of privatization? Sure. But odds are against us that she’ll be much help. The best scenario we can expect from another Clinton administration is a continuation of the status quo – a status quo that has dramatically increased school privatization.

There are worse things, but can’t we do better than vote for 4-8 more years of slow educational death?

If privatization is the first front of the war against public schools, standardization is the second. Schools are being forced to march in lockstep with Common Core Standards while giving a barrage of high stakes tests.

Both Sanders and Clinton have spotty records here. Sanders voted against the terrible No Child Left Behind legislation that spawned the beast, while Clinton helped nurture it. However, just this year Sanders joined Congressional Democrats trying to continue the era of test and punish through the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) – some of which failed and some of which became part of the final law.

But it doesn’t really matter.

Standardization is the claw of the beast. Privatization is the beast, itself.

High stakes testing is the justification for privatization. Low test scores at under-resourced schools are the excuse for turning them into charters. If Sanders stops the move to charterize, he removes the reason to standardize. A dead lion will not use its claws.

Moreover, he’s had some genuinely good ideas about how best to improve our schools. It was Sanders who inserted into the ESSA a provision allowing some states to develop alternatives to standardized testing.

While most Democrats champion increasing funding to the neediest districts, they blame their inability to do so on the Republicans. Meanwhile, Sanders has proposed rewriting the way schools are funded in the first place. He is the only mainstream candidate with a plan to ensure every school in America receives equitable funding. His solution: federalize pubic school budgets similar to the Scandinavian model that has been proven effective. Is it a risk? Sure. Might it not work? Sure. But at least Bernie has new ideas that could potentially do more than just put Band-Aids on decades of wrongheaded school policies.

This is radically more than just fighting privatization – it is turning it around in its tracks. Only Bernie is actually suggesting a robust, equitable education for all children from preschool through college.

THAT’S why I support Bernie Sanders. THAT’S why I can’t wait to cast my vote in the Pennsylvania primary. THAT’S why so many teachers, parents and concerned citizens are feeling the Bern.

Come join the Revolution already in progress.

It is our fight to win or lose.

8 thoughts on “The One Reason Bernie Sanders is the Best Mainstream Candidate for Parents and Teachers

  1. I’m an independent voter and I am not registered with any party. In the past, the Democrats allowed independents to vote in their primaries—the GOP never has—but I’ve read that this year, independents like me, that make up the largest voting block in the United States, have been shut out of the primary process in the Democratic Party too.

    According to Gallop, 43% of registered voters are political independents. Registered Republicans make up 26% and Democrats 30%.

    If this is true, then the two major parties have locked out the largest block of registered voters when it comes to selecting who runs for president.

    In the general election, it will be independent voters like me who will decide what candidate wins the popular vote while 538 hand-picked Americans—selected by the leaders of the two major political parties—who belong to the Electoral College, have the power to decide who the next president will be. The following video shows how the Electoral College Works and why our votes mean nothing when it comes to electing a president.

    What this means is even of Donald Trump won the popular vote in an election against HRC, he could still lose in the Electoral College and HRC would end up being President—for an example, this is what happened for G. W. Bush when he ran against Gore.


  2. There are a number of the Democratic candidates that I like and would happily vote for. In 2016 I voted for Hillary but would have wanted Bernie to be the primary winner. I cannot vote for Trump because he lacks just about most qualities I like in people; and more so for presidential consideration.
    Bernie’s one major error so far is his treatment of HRC after he lost the primary and I think the attitude displayed needs working on.
    But his message has resonated with me, his courage in standing up has gotten my admiration, and his consistency has convinced me that he is for real. The inequality which pervades our Nation will cause increasing social problems and has to be addressed, and Bernie seems to be the one who recognizes this, with plans to do something about it. Yes, Bernie I do joyfully and strongly support, but will vote Democratic if anyone else wins.
    I dearly hope he wins. Mr. Biden is popular but is terribly two dimensional; flat.


    • Thanks, Melchi34, for commenting. I only disagree about Bernie’s handling of HRC after she got the nomination in 2016. Sanders did 39 rallies for Clinton in 13 states over the final three months of the 2016 general election. Clinton only did 16 for Obama in 2008. This whole narrative that Bernie didn’t give Hillary the proper support is bogus.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.