If you want to get rich in education, don’t become a teacher.
Open a charter school or take a job at a testing corporation.
Sure, charter schools are elaborate scams to make money off children while providing fewer services.
Sure, standardized tests are just corporate welfare that labels poor and minority kids failures and pretends that’s their fault.
And teachers? They’re just the people who do all the actual work of educating children. Yet there’s never enough money, never enough resources for the job they do.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average salary of public school teachers in Pennsylvania is between $53,000 and $59,000 per year.
Compare that with the salaries of the people who make and distribute the state’s federally mandated standardized tests – employees at Data Recognition Corporation (DRC).
DRC publishes numerous assessments in various states. However, in the Keystone state, the corporation makes everything from the Pennsylvania System of School Assessments (PSSA) to the Keystone Exams in Algebra, Literature and Biology.
At its 14 locations across the country, the company has more than 750 full time employees and 5,000 seasonal ones used mainly to help grade the tests.
According to glassdoor.com, a site that showcases job listings, here are some openings at DRC and their associated salaries:
Test Development Specialist – $68K-$86K
Quality Assurance Analyst – $77K-$83K
Technology Manager – $77K-$84K
Business Analyst – $81,856
Software Developer – $83,199
Psychometrician – $95,870
Senior Software Developer – $96,363
So teachers spend 180 days in overcrowded classrooms with fewer resources than they need – often forced to buy school supplies for their students out of pocket – to get their students ready to take the high stakes tests.
Meanwhile, the test makers sit in luxury office buildings taking home tens of thousands of dollars more just to make the tests that students take over the course of a few weeks.
And these corporate test employees DO work in luxury.
Here are some of the benefits they receive listed on DRC’s own Website:
“DRC offers a comprehensive benefits program that allows employees to make choices that best meet their current and future needs.
Key Benefits
- Choice of medical plans
- Choice of dental plans
- Flexible spending accounts
- HSA account
- 401K savings plan
- Profit sharing
- Short- and long-term disability plans
Wellbeing Benefits
- Paid vacation
- Paid holidays
- Personal time off
- Workout facilities/locker rooms at select locations
- Tuition reimbursement
- Community service hours
- Discount programs
- Adoption assistance
- Fitness classes
- On-site massage
- Walking paths
Convenience Benefits
-
Business casual attire
-
On-site subsidized cafeterias
-
Dry cleaning pick-up and delivery
-
Company store”
It’s funny. Some folks get all in a lather about the much less extravagant benefits given to teachers, but I’ve never heard anyone in a rage about these benefits being paid to corporate test makers.
And keep in mind, both teachers and test makers are being paid with public tax dollars. YOU are funding the test makers on-the-job massage break just as you’re funding the public school teachers trip to the doctor for anti-anxiety meds.
The Pennsylvania legislature has entered into three contracts with DRC through 6/30/21 for services related to standardized testing for a total of $741,158,039.60, according to State Sen. Andrew Dinniman (D-West Chester).
That is your money funding the test makers workout facilities and flexible spending accounts. You pay for their walking trails, fitness classes, dry cleaning services and subsidized cafeterias.
Meanwhile, public school teachers – who do the bulk of the work educating children – are left struggling to make ends meet.
According to estimates by the National Education Association (NEA), teaching salaries from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia have stagnated by 2.3% in the past 15 years.
But that’s way better than in most parts of the country.
In West Virginia, teachers across the state went on a 9-day strike to get a 5% pay raise.
Teachers in Arizona and Oklahoma are planning their own strike due to even worse neglect.
In Oklahoma, some educators have actually had to resort to selling plasma in order to survive.
KOCO News 5, in the Sooner State, reported on a fifth grade teacher at Newcastle Elementary school, Jay Thomas, who sells blood to supplement his income.
“I’ve got a permanent scar doing that. Just did it yesterday,” Thomas said.
“I’ve been doing it for a couple of years. I’ve given over 100 times. It’s twice a week.”
Though Thomas has been an Oklahoma teacher for 16 years, he makes less than $40,000 a year after taxes.
Selling plasma nets him about $65 a week.
And if you think Thomas is the anomaly, when this story was spread on Twitter, other teachers responded that they do the same, some even including pictures of themselves at the blood bank.
This is why there is a teacher shortage in many states. This is why fewer college students are entering the field. And it is why many of those educators who have stayed in the classroom are considering strikes.
We take teachers for granted. We value the work they do but not the people who do that work.
Meanwhile, we give extravagant rewards to the corporate vultures who provide very little for children but divert funding that should be going to educate students – the standardized testing corporations and the privatized school operators.
If we really want to improve our education system in this country, the first step is to value those who work in it.
We need to turn the money hose off for unnecessary expenses like standardized testing and allowing charter and voucher operators to pocket tax money as profit.
And we need to spend more on the people in the trenches day-in-day-out making sure our children get the quality education they deserve.
We need to give teachers the resources and respect they need to succeed and end the scams of high stakes testing and school privatization.
Like this post? I’ve written a book, “Gadfly on the Wall: A Public School Teacher Speaks Out on Racism and Reform,” now available from Garn Press. Ten percent of the proceeds go to the Badass Teachers Association. Check it out!
Let’s welcome the return of the Robber Barrons because that’s what they are: greedy, manipulating, frauds, cheats, liars, and any other insults you want to throw at them.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
WOW!
LikeLike
[…] I’m certainly not against this one. CAP notes that teachers only take home about 60 percent of the salaries that employees with similar levels of education earn. They suggest a base salary of $50,000 – up from the current average of $38,000 for incoming educators. […]
LikeLike
[…] School funding may not be enough to give every one of the 50.7 million students in public school a first class education, but it’s more than enough to make a cabal of entrepreneurs and corporate officers rich. […]
LikeLike
[…] I’m certainly not against this one. CAP notes that teachers only take home about 60 percent of the salaries that employees with similar levels of education earn. They suggest a base salary of $50,000 – up from the current average of $38,000 for incoming educators. […]
LikeLike
[…] a country we have taken our attention away from what’s really important. We’ve stopped focusing on how to make education better and instead equated it with how to make […]
LikeLike
[…] Instead we’ve let special interests feed off of HER – charter schools, voucher schools, high stakes standardized testing corporations, the ed tech industry and even book and software publishers through the boondoggle of Common […]
LikeLike
[…] that human educators and brick and mortar schools are unnecessary. And I shed real tears at the massive amounts of funding being funneled to corporations that could be better spent in our own […]
LikeLike
[…] providing services for schools are supposed to make a living – not a killing – off the public’s […]
LikeLike
[…] providing services for schools are supposed to make a living – not a killing – off the public’s dime. The same can be said for school […]
LikeLike
[…] School used to be about curriculum and pedagogy. It was focused on student learning – not how we assess that learning. Now that standardized tests have been mandated in all 50 states as a means of judging whether our schools are doing a good job (and assorted punishments and rewards put in place), it’s changed the entire academic landscape. In short, when you make school all about standardized tests, you force educators to teach with that as their m…. […]
LikeLike
[…] The testing industrial complex is like a black hole. Not only does it suck up funding that is desperately needed elsewhere without providing anything of real value in return, its enormous gravity subverts and distorts everything around it. […]
LikeLike
[…] our most impoverished students deal with everyday. Instead, we push a school privatization and testing industry that makes trillions of dollars for corporations at the expense of our […]
LikeLike
[…] If it were up to me, I’d scrap high stakes testing as a waste of education spending that did next to nothing to show how students or schools were doing. Real accountability would come from looking at the resources actually provided to schools and what schools did with them. It would result from observing teachers and principals to see what education they actually provided – not some second hand guessing game based on the whims of corporations making money on the tests, the grading of the tests and the subsequent remediation mate…. […]
LikeLike
[…] Yet this fact is repeatedly ignored by the media and public policymakers because there has grown up an entire industry around it that makes large profits from the inequality it recreates. […]
LikeLike
[…] report does a good job of outlining the fiscal waste, lack of accountability and dubious academic merits of the Keystone Exams, but it fails to note similar qualities in its own […]
LikeLike
[…] is an entire testing and school privatization industrial complex out there trying to prove that traditional public schools are bad and need replaced with business […]
LikeLike
[…] is an entire testing and school privatization industrial complex out there trying to prove that traditional public schools are bad and need replaced with business […]
LikeLike
[…] The situation is worsened by the supply-side economic policies governing public schools. There are already numerous roads to privatize public schools and turn tax dollars into corporate profits. Moreover, the standardized testing industry monetizes learning when their services are mandated by the state and federal government. They conveniently offer to remediate the large numbers of students who don’t score well on these s… […]
LikeLike
[…] Teacher pay in the United States (and many other countries) is not competitive for the amount of training required and responsibilities put on employees. […]
LikeLike
[…] When psychometricians design a standardized test, on the other hand, they aren’t centered on the student. They aren’t trying to find out if the test taker knows the most important facts or has the most essential skills in each field. Instead, there is a tendency to eliminate the most important test questions so that the test – not the student – will be better equipped to make comparisons between students based on a small set of questions. After all, a standardize test isn’t designed for a few classes – it is one size fits all. […]
LikeLike
[…] So as many of these same bureaucrats complain about “failing schools” and “ineffective teachers,” it is these very same complaints and the efforts taken in their name that result in ineffectiveness. […]
LikeLike
[…] short, teachers, parents and students are fighting against exactly the same kind of nonsense the Walmart heirs are hoping they can get the gullible public to believe parents actually really, […]
LikeLike
[…] Economic interests have trumped academic ones for decades. […]
LikeLike
[…] you want REAL fraud, you have to go to the standardized testing and ed tech industry sucking away billions or taxpayer dollars while providing services that are […]
LikeLike
[…] order for you REAL fraud, you must go to the standardized testing and ed tech industry sucking away billions or taxpayer dollars whereas offering providers which can […]
LikeLike
[…] multi-million dollar corporation wants to make sure Pennsylvania’s children keep getting standardized […]
LikeLike
[…] multi-million dollar corporation desires to verify Pennsylvania’s kids hold getting standardized […]
LikeLike
[…] does a single test score from a corporation like Pearson show you more than a year’s worth of academic assessments from a […]
LikeLike
[…] does a single test score from a corporation like Pearson show you more than a year’s worth of academic assessments from a […]
LikeLike
[…] a global pandemic had shuttered classrooms, no children were being forced to take the multi-billion dollar testing company’s […]
LikeLike
[…] Standardized testing is a multi-million dollar business. […]
LikeLike
[…] There’s no money for tutoring or counselors or extra curricular activities or reducing class size. But there’s a treasure chest full of gold doubloons (i.e. tax dollars) for testing companies to give u… […]
LikeLike
[…] But, of course, this isn’t free. We’ll have to pay these test-creators, and pay them handsomely. […]
LikeLike
[…] They have a vested interest in selling tests, selling test prep materials, software, etc. It’s just a pity that so many of our lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are persuaded by their arguments (or the hefty campaign contributions that come with that persuasion). […]
LikeLike
[…] Standardized testing is a multi-billion dollar industry. The tests are written by huge corporations. They are graded by the same corporations. And when students fail, it is often the exact same corporations who provide the remediation materials, software and teacher training. […]
LikeLike
[…] and newly minted principals fresh out of prep schools funded by billionaire philanthropists who make money off the standardized testing industry. I don’t love being called a hero if I put my life on the line to keep children safe during a […]
LikeLike
[…] Fun Fact: This idea is so obvious to anyone who’s actually in school buildings that it has gotten through somewhat to the mass media. However, the drum of bogus learning loss is still being beaten by powerful companies determined to make money off of this catastrophe. […]
LikeLike
[…] Most people can see it’s a scam and a racist one to boot. […]
LikeLike
[…] more evaluations based on eugenics and pseudoscience. No more tests supported by the bottom line of corporations who make money creating the tests, grading the tests and selling us the remediation materials to […]
LikeLike
[…] Huge corporations make the tests, grade the tests and then sell remediation materials when students fail. It’s a huge scam. […]
LikeLike
[…] Huge corporations make the tests, grade the tests and then sell remediation materials when students fail. It’s a huge scam. […]
LikeLike
[…] army of corporate education consultants are looking for ways to give shallow professional development to teachers (at a cost to the district) and then run complicated programs from afar. […]
LikeLike
[…] Corporations everywhere are trying to sell them unnecessary junk and pocket wads of taxpayer cash. […]
LikeLike
[…] Corporations everywhere are trying to sell them unnecessary junk and pocket wads of taxpayer cash. […]
LikeLike
[…] have been complaining about the validity of standardized testing for more than a century. But business interests make billions of dollars off the industry it creates. Guess which group policymakers continue to heed over the […]
LikeLike
[…] merely an advertisement for these testing companies and a host of school privatization enterprises offering profit-making alternatives predicated on that exact premise. […]
LikeLike
[…] When psychometricians design a standardized test, on the other hand, they aren’t centered on the student. They aren’t trying to find out if the test taker knows the most important facts or has the most essential skills in each field. Instead, there is a tendency to eliminate the most important test questions so that the test – not the student – will be better equipped to make comparisons between students based on a small set of questions. After all, a standardize test isn’t designed for a few classes – it is one size fits all. […]
LikeLike
[…] And now the little investment firm that could has its sights on the standardized testing game. […]
LikeLike
[…] And now the little investment firm that could has its sights on the standardized testing game. […]
LikeLike