If ISIS extremists flew in from the Middle East and took over our public schools, we wouldn’t stand for it.
But if those extremists are from our own state or federal government, we just yawn and change the channel.
Though not for the last three nights.
A handful of plucky Newark school students have demanded our attention, and, Brother, do they have it!
At least six Newark students have staged a sit-in at the offices of Superintendent Cami Anderson demanding she step down and the district be returned to the voters. The district has been under state control for the last two decades.
This could have been handled easily. Anderson could have met with the students to talk about their concerns. After all, she is a public servant and even school kids are members of the public.
But instead she’s abandoned her office, sent threatening letters to the children’s parents and blocked or held up shipments of food to the young protestors.
Undeterred, the youngsters have set up a live feed on youtube to broadcast their action to the world, tweeting with the hashtags #OccupyNPS and #OurNewark. And the world has been paying attention. Local officials including Mayor Ras Baracka are calling for Anderson’s resignation. The teachers union is discussing holding an illegal strike if the students are forcibly removed.
But more importantly, people all over the country are talking about something they haven’t talked about – maybe – ever: local control.
What gives the state or federal government the right to come in and take over your public school?
Sure if there’s some kind of malfeasance going on, it makes sense to oust a particular school director. If the entire board is working in collusion against the public interest, maybe then it makes sense to get rid of all of them. A temporary acting school board might be necessary in such an unlikely case.
But why not then just hold another election and be done with it? Why would the state keep control over a public school for years or decades after a crisis?
The answer: many of our state and federal government officials don’t believe in local control.
Don’t worry. They’re not against it for everyone.
They don’t come in and take over just any school. If you live in a rich neighborhood, you can breathe easy. No state has ever taken over a posh district.
However, if you live in a poor community with a school that struggles to get by on the contributions of the impoverished local tax base, then the state may be gunning for you.
In my home state of Pennsylvania this has happened numerous times: Duquesne, Chester Upland and Philadelphia spring immediately to mind. In fact, Philly schools have been under control of the State Recovery Commission almost as long as Newark. At the same time Newark students were settling in for their second night in Anderson’s office, the Philadelphia SRC was having citizens arrested for protesting the state-appointed directors decision to expand charter schools.
What gives these people the right to take over our schools?
The excuse is always that the democratically-elected school board didn’t manage the district’s finances well enough. That’s why there were dwindling services for students.
However, the truth is more simple. School directors weren’t able to get blood from a stone. While rich districts rely heavily on a fat tax base that could support whatever services their children need, poor ones limp by. The state and federal government – seeing the trouble our poor districts are in – have a responsibility to come forward and provide financial assistance. After all, every child in this country has the right to a free and appropriate public school education. This doesn’t change just because your folks are poor.
But instead of facing up to their responsibilities, the state and federal government have used this monetary crisis to steal control of the poorest public schools.
And what’s worse, they haven’t improved the quality of services for students under their care! Instead they make sure any moderate increase in funding gets siphoned off to the corporate education reform movement before it ever reaches kids.
The standardized testing industry has increased 57% in the last three years alone to a $2.5 billion a year market. And that doesn’t even count the billions more being raked in by textbook companies (many of them are the same ones producing and grading the tests) with test prep materials and Common Core.
So why does the state and federal government unconstitutionally swipe away local control from people living in poor districts?
Because they can make money off of it!
This is exactly the abomination that the Newark Student Union is shinning light on.
Five years ago, Newark Schools received a $100 million gift from Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg to turn around the district. The project is called One Newark. The director is Anderson.
However, instead of turning the district around, it has been responsible for closing or relocating schools, opening new charter schools and displacing staff. And no improvement to district services!
Where’s the money going? Here’s a hint: Anderson has been sharply criticized for spending $37 million on consulting fees to prominent factory school reformers.
It’s time to end the practice of public school takeovers. There is no good reason for the state or federal government to snatch away our local schools. This is clearly a violation of the almost every state constitution (including New Jersey and Pennsylvania’s) and the rights of citizens and students. Public schools should remain public.
This is what our children are trying to tell us there in Cami Anderson’s office.
As they continue for a third night, I find myself with two distinct opposite emotions.
I feel an overwhelming shame for my generation. We have let greed get the better of us. How dare we trample the future of countless generations of children for financial gain! When I think of people like Anderson and ex-Mayor Cory Booker, people like my own ex-Governor Tom Corbett, I want to throw up.
However, at the same time I’m also filled with such immense hope! These children have shown us that we can be so much more than the sum of our base natures! We can overcome our menial immediate needs and put the suffering of others over that of ourselves!
I can’t express enough the joy and admiration I have for the members of the Newark Student Union! They represent the future we might attain – if only us adults will let them shine!
UPDATE: The sit-in ended after three days when Anderson met with students. They continue to call for her resignation.
This article was also published on the Badass Teachers Association blog.
6 thoughts on “When Kids Teach Adults – Lessons from the Newark Student Union Sit-in”
The Newark Students Union and the NJ Communities United group are terrific. Did you read about their Nov 2014 visit to AEI/American Enterprise Institute in DC the day Cami Anderson was the scheduled speaker?
FYI, M Zuckerberg’s funding, with matching dollars, was handled through nonprofit Foundation for Newark’s Future. That group has former TFA, former Newark Charter School Fund people as leaders. MZ’s gift is not synonymous with Cami Anderson’s One Newark plan. That plan, which may have had initial seeds under former Acting Commissioner Cerf (now at Rupert Murdoch’s Amplify w. Joel Klein), is to close/reorganize schools and impose universal enrollment system (without revealing the secret algorithm for “Cami’s Choice”).
Support the students!
The damage that “no child left behind’ has visited on public education can’t be overestimated.
That finally, people are waking up to the harmful privatization of public education and fighting back against the charter school movement is nothing short of amazing:
These students get an A+ in civics: and their ‘Waiting For Superman’ would be teachers — in fact, a bunch of rich people who wouldn’t let their own kids NEAR a public school — a big fat F.
States rights vs federal rights: vaguely familiar. Oh yes, the Civil War. Well, we’re much more civil now. It’s just a civil war. Can you imagine a politician crazy enough to rock that boat? I can. Abraham Lincoln. God forbid he made decisions based on whatever passed for pollsters in the 19th century. He was so unpopular half the country up and seceded. Yet now, he’s revered as one the greatest presidents. We don’t observe holidays for Wilson, Hoover, or even FDR. Your blog resonates strongly with me but I fear the polarization and mass media manipulation we face nowadays can only be resolved radically. It’s going to take a Ghandi or Chavez-level movement. Someone who can get through to the country that public education and the welfare of the middle class are inextricably bound.
[…] to management companies or become charter schools.” A small group of students from the Newark (NJ) Student Union have taken a page from the protests of the 1960s and have been sitting-in at the office of Cami […]
[…] he heard the Newark Student Union was having difficulty getting food during their sit-in at Cami Anderson’s office, he volunteered to personally send them something to […]