You wouldn’t travel a long distance in your car without strapping on a seatbelt.
So why do you think teachers should spend 30 plus years in the classroom without seniority?
Everywhere you look, billionaires are paying millionaires in government to pass laws to cut taxes, slash funding and find cheaper ways to run public schools for pleb kids like yours and mine. And that often means finding ways to weaken protections for teachers, fire those with the most experience and replace them with glorified WalMart greeters.
“Hello. Welcome to SchoolMart. Please plug into your iPad and begin today’s lesson.”
This is class warfare cloaked as a coupon. It’s sabotage described as savings.
And the only way they get away with it is because reasonable people buy the steaming load of manure they’re selling.
MYTH: Seniority with Tenure means a Job for Life
Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of teachers out of work.
Tell that to all the optimistic go getters who prance out of college ready to change the world as teachers and fizzle out during the first five years.
Tell it to the handful of truly terrible teachers who for reasons only they can explain stay in a job they hate through countless interventions and retrainings until the principal has no choice but to give them their walking papers.
Oh, yes. Teachers DO get fired. I’ve seen it with my own eyes numerous times. And in each case, they truly deserved it.
(Any “bad teachers” still on the job mean there’s a worse administrator somewhere neglecting to do his or her duty.)
So what does “Seniority” and “Tenure” even mean for teachers?
Basically, it means two things:
(1) If you want to fire a teacher, you have to prove he or she deserves it. That’s Tenure.
(2) When public school districts downsize, they can’t just lay off people based on their salaries. That’s Seniority.
If you think about it, both of these are good things.
It is not a good work environment for teachers or students when educators can be fired without cause at the whim of incoming administration or radical, newly-elected school board members. Teaching is one of the most political professions we have. Tenure shields educators from the winds of partisanship. It allows them to grade children fairly whose parents have connections on the school board, it allows them to speak honestly and openly about school policy, and it empowers them to act in the best interests of their students – all things that otherwise could jeopardize their jobs.
Likewise, seniority stops the budget butchers from making experience and stability a liability.
It stops number crunchers from saying:
Hey, Mrs. Wilson has been here for 25 years. She’s got a shelf full of teaching awards. Parents and students love her. But she’s at the top of the salary scale so she’s gotta’ go.
I know what you’re going to say: Aren’t there younger teachers who are also outstanding?
Yes. There are.
However, if you put all the best teachers in one group, most of them will be more experienced.
It just makes sense. You get better at something – anything – the more you do it. This could be baking pies, building houses or teaching children how to read and write.
So why don’t we keep the best teachers and get rid of those who aren’t up to their level?
Because determining who’s the best is subjective. And if you let the moneymen decide – POOF! – suddenly the teachers who make the most money will disappear and only the cheapest ones will be left.
Couldn’t you base it on something more universal like student test scores?
Yes, you could, but student test scores are a terrible way to evaluate teachers. If you wanted to get rid of the highest paid employees, all you’d have to do is give them the most struggling students. Suddenly, their students have the worst test scores, and they’re packing up their stuff in little cardboard boxes.
Almost any stat can be gamed.
The only one that is solidly unbiased? Seniority.
You’ve either been here 15 years or you haven’t. There’s not much anyone can do to change that fact.
That’s why it prevents the kind of creative accounting you see from penny pinching number crunchers.
Along with Tenure, Seniority is a safety net. Pure and simple. It helps keep the most qualified teachers in the room with kids. Period.
But look. It’s not perfect.
Neither are seat belts.
If you’re in a car crash on a bridge where it’s necessary to get out of your vehicle quickly before it plunges into the water below, it’s possible your seat belt may make it more difficult to reach safety. This is rather rare, and it doesn’t stop most people from buckling up.
I’ve known excellent teachers who were furloughed while less creative ones were kept on. It does happen.
But if we got rid of seniority, it would happen way more often.
That’s the bottom line.
Instead of finding more leeway to fire more teachers, we should be finding ways to increase school funding – especially at the most under-resourced schools – which, by the way, are the ones where lawmakers most want to eliminate seniority. We should be looking for ways to make downsizing unnecessary. We should be investing in our children and our future.
We’ll never improve the quality of the public school system by firing our way to the bottom. That’s like trying to lose weight by hacking at yourself with a straight razor. It just won’t work.
We need to commit to public schools. We need to commit to public school students. And the best way to do that is to support the teachers who devote their lives showing up every day to help them learn.
11 thoughts on “Teacher Seniority – the Seat Belts of the Education Profession”
Right on all counts. Pity you’re preaching to the choir. I constantly educate people about what tenure actually means. The myth persists. Teachers enter into a lifetime of debt being maligned by the govt. and media, get told how, what and when to teach and still persist in being teachers. (Did I mention the low pay and long hours?) If fewer enter the profession, public education suffers. And as goes public education, so goes the middle class.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well said, Thomas. Hopefully we can initiate a few new members into the choir sometime soon.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
[…] since we’re asking questions, why do we ALSO challenge their right to a fair wage, decent healthcare, benefits, reasonable hours, overtime, sick leave, training, collective bargaining… just about ANYTHING to encourage them to stay in the profession and to get the next generation […]
[…] wonder why college undergraduates aren’t racing to become education majors. I wonder why there aren’t more incentives to get more teachers in the classroom and why there isn’t a boom of more teaching […]
[…] When you attack unions and union benefits, you’re really attacking students. A teacher who can be fired at the whim of an administrator or school director is not as affective at her job. She has less autonomy and freedom to do what is right for her given students. And she has less reason to take a chance on the profession in the first place. […]
[…] And when I have a better working environment, my students have a better learning environment! […]
[…] Having a well-educated, experienced, caring teacher in the classroom IS what’s in the best interes…. That means having a teacher with collective bargaining rights so she can grade her students fairly without fear of political ramifications if someone complains to the school board. That means being able to blow the whistle if classroom conditions are unsafe or policies handed down by functionaries (like DeVos) aren’t helping kids learn. […]
[…] And treating teachers like worker drones can never achieve this goal. You can’t entrust a whole class of people with the most precious thing you have – your children – and then treat them like dirt. […]
Even tenure is not the right word for the meager protections K-12 public school teachers MAY have. Due process rights is closer to what is meant when people use the word tenure for K-12 public school teachers. Most associate tenure with “job for life” as with university level tenure. It’s not that way at all.
I’ve seen too many times how incompetent administrators (what I call adminimals) can easily get rid of teachers with due process rights and it is not pretty. I’ve had them attempt that crap with me but I outsmarted them each time (not hard to do if one knows what to do). But being subjected to that does tend to sap one’s energies. . . good thing the students were there to bring up my spirits just by being the students they were. Isn’t that why we go into teaching. . . to help students be who they are?
[…] educators who have been in the classroom the longest are also the highest paid. So if we just let them go, we can save some money for other […]