If the Coronavirus quarantine has taught educators one thing, it’s this.
Online learning is not better than in-person schooling.
After all these years of corporations throwing apps at us and well-meaning administrators providing us with devices and philanthrocapitalists pumping billions of dollars into ed tech first academic schemes, we can all see now that the emperor has no clothes.
When schools nationwide are closed to stop the spread of a global pandemic and learning is restricted to whatever teachers can cobble together on sites like Google Classroom and ZOOM, we can all see the Imperial scepter blowing in the wind.
The problem is that this is only clear to parents, students and teachers.
The people who get to make ed policy decisions are as blind as ever – as witnessed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s tone deaf insistence that his state reimagine schools with the help of billionaire school saboteur Bill Gates.
But the rest of us – you know, those grounded in reality – can see the problems with remote learning staring us in the face.
Most importantly, the Internet is not a conducive environment for learning.
I don’t mean that learning can’t take place there.
You could learn in a fox hole while being shelled by enemy forces. But if your content extends to something more complex than “Duck” or other survival tactics, this may not be the best place to learn it. After all, environment plays a key role in knowledge acquisition.
Moreover, different people learn things better in different circumstances. And, contrary to our current education policies that view children as stakeholders or consumers, they are in fact people.
There are some children who learn better online than in a brick and mortar classroom. But these kids are few and far between.
In general, the younger the child (both physically and psychologically), the more important it is that he or she be given the opportunity to learn in an actual classroom.
Why?
It really comes down to who controls the environment.
In a classroom, the teacher decides most everything about the physical space and what possibilities there will be. She places the books, hangs the posters, sets the lighting, displays student work, etc.
In a virtual environment, the space is defined to a small degree by the teacher, but it is mostly determined by the ed tech provider and the open world of the Internet.
In short, teachers have much more control over physical classrooms and can remove distractions.
Online, educators have very little control over this.
LINE OF SIGHT
For instance, in my physical classroom, if I wanted to see what a student was doing, all I had to do is walk up to him and look.
I controlled what I see, and hiding things from me was difficult.
Online, if I want to see what a student is doing (let’s say on a video communications platform like ZOOM), I have little control over what I see. The student is in control of the camera. If it is pointing at the student or placed so as to hide certain behavior or even if the camera is currently on or not is not in my control. Students are empowered to hide anything they want, and there’s not much I can do about it.
When teaching online, I’ve had students texting on cell phones, playing video games on computers, having side conversations with friends in their bedrooms, playing with pets – and trying to hide this with the way they display themselves on camera.
I’ve had kids mysteriously turn off the camera or point it away from their faces until I ask them to switch it back on or swivel it back to themselves.
DO YOU HEAR WHAT I HEAR?
When I first started teaching online a few weeks ago, one of the most powerful tools at my disposal seemed to be the mute button.
If several kids weren’t hearing me because of side chatter, I could simply mute everyone and fill the blessed silence with instruction.
However, I soon discovered that this is deceptive.
Just because you don’t hear the students, doesn’t mean they aren’t talking. Some kids use the online chat stream to continue side chatter. Others forgo that entirely for text and Facebook messaging.
What’s worse, it’s often hard for the teacher to even know whether anything she said is actually being heard.
TOO MUCH CHOICE
One of the great strengths of online learning is that it gives students an incredible amount of choice. But that is also its greatest weakness.
I can give assignments through a file sharing site like Google Classroom and let students complete it at their own pace.
The problem is that kids (especially young kids) need their pace monitored.
You can’t give them too much time to get something done because many will procrastinate through the deadline.
In my physical classroom, I would often give an assignment and then provide at least some time for them to start it. The idea was that even if they don’t finish it with me, they are more likely to complete something they already began.
However, online it is completely up to them when to do an assignment. They are responsible for their own time management – and that’s a skill we, as educators, struggle to teach them.
As a result, most students don’t get these assignments done on time – if at all.
Even when they do the work, I’m bombarded by a slew of submissions around midnight or the early hours of the AM.
HOW TO ASK A QUESTION YOU DON’T KNOW YOU HAVE
Then there’s the question of… well… questions.
In my brick and mortar classroom, if a child was unsure of something, all she had to do was raise her hand and ask. Online, there are multiple ways to communicate with me – kids can send me an email, message me or verbally ask me something during a video chat.
The problem is that sometimes they don’t know they’re confused.
In my physical classroom, since all students are working on an assignment together in that same time and space, I can go from desk to desk and see how they’re progressing.
If they’re getting something wrong, I can correct it in real time. I can give suggestions and encouragement even before the work is done.
Online, I’m mostly limited to commenting on the final project. If a student didn’t understand the directions – and didn’t even understand that he didn’t understand the directions – I don’t know until the work is done.
This presents a problem. Do I explain the error and ask him to to do the work all over again? Or do I explain the error but accept the work for what it is?
I’ll admit, I usually do the later.
STUDENTS M.I.A.
Which brings me to mysterious absences.
I don’t mean kids who don’t show up to video conferences – though there are many of those.
I mean kids who for all intents and purposes appear to be there in ZOOM and then suddenly disappear never to return that day.
They could have a device or Internet issue. And if this happens every once in a while, it’s understandable. But what about kids who do this all the time?
If your iPad isn’t charged one day, I guess things happen. But if it isn’t charged everyday, that’s a problem. Your problem – one you need to solve.
I know every district is different in this regard, but my school provides every student with devices and even WiFi if necessary. Even in the physical classroom, using devices always came with a chorus of whines about them not being charged.
Once again, we’re putting this responsibility on students and families. In the days before distance learning, we could question whether that was fair. In the Coronavirus dystopia, we have little choice but to do it.
However, this brave new world even makes an issue out of bathroom breaks.
In the brick and mortar classroom, kids would ask to go to the restroom and then be sent one at a time. Online some kids just turn off their camera or leave it idling on an empty seat or the ceiling. It is next to impossible to tell whether these breaks are genuine or even to estimate their duration.
Some students are gone for the majority of the meeting. In a world where video conferences are few and far between, is it so much to ask that you use the restroom BEFORE going to ZOOM?
INVADERS
But let’s not forget unwanted guests.
These platforms require students to know a dedicated Web address and sometimes a password to get in.
Yet these are children. They sometimes share these security measures with people who were not invited.
Even in my physical classroom, sometimes students not on my roster would try to get in to talk with a friend or even just sit in on my amazing lessons. I could stop them at the door and send them on their way.
Online, some sites like ZOOM give me similar power, and others like Kahoot (a game based learning platform) do not. Even when every person entering has to be approved by me, all I see is the name they’ve given their device. If an enterprising stranger wanted to rename their device to that of one of my students, I probably wouldn’t catch it until they were in.
There have been several times when someone with one of my students’ names got into a ZOOM meeting, but either refused or couldn’t turn on their camera. I had no choice but to boot them out.
On some sites like Kahoot, there is no video. I had no idea who was signing in – I just saw the name they input.
So sometimes I had two students with the same name. Or I had let’s say 8 kids in the class but 9 kids were signing on to Kahoot.
It’s maddening!
ASSESSMENTS AND CHEATING
Now let’s talk tests.
But they are a necessary evil to judge what information students have learned. Moreover, a creative teacher can design them to reduce the regurgitation of facts and increase critical analysis backed by facts.
In a physical classroom, teachers can monitor students during test taking. Online, they can’t. So there’s always a question of cheating.
Every scrap of information in human history is available somewhere online. If students try hard enough, they can find the answer to any question with a deft Google search.
However, to be honest I don’t think I’ve had too much trouble with this as yet. My students either don’t care enough to cheat, cannot figure out how to do so effectively or have too much self respect.
Or maybe I just haven’t caught them.
In the physical classroom, I had several students try to pass off others work – essays or poems – as their own. But I haven’t assigned anything so ambitious through distance learning yet.
CONCLUSIONS
Perhaps that’s why it drives me nuts when policymakers and media types make statements about what an overwhelming success this has all been.
Teachers and districts have tried their best. Students and families are giving their all. But this experiment does not demonstrate why we should all embrace distance learning once the Coronavirus pandemic is under control.
It shows why we MUST return to the brick and mortar classroom as soon as it is safe to do so.
Reimagining school will not require more ed tech.
Kids need to be in the presence of physical human beings in a real environment with their peers to maximize their learning.
We need smaller classes, equitable funding, desegregation, social justice, wide curriculum, and an end to high stakes testing, school privatization, science denial and anti-intellectualism.
But more than anything, we need policymakers who are willing to listen to and include the people on the ground when making decisions that affect us all.
Like this post? You might want to consider becoming a Patreon subscriber. This helps me continue to keep the blog going and get on with this difficult and challenging work.
Plus you get subscriber only extras!
Just CLICK HERE.
I’ve also written a book, “Gadfly on the Wall: A Public School Teacher Speaks Out on Racism and Reform,” now available from Garn Press. Ten percent of the proceeds go to the Badass Teachers Association. Check it out!
I don’t think having all classes on line is anyone’s first choice, but there will be some risk of infection for students and staff for at least another year.. If the school staff and parents are not willing to bear that risk, having all classes online for the 2020-21 school year is the only alternative to having no classes at all.
LikeLike
I mostly agree with you, Teaching Economist, which terrifies me. Online teaching is better than risking more lives unnecessarily. But if we can contain the virus enough to make it safe to reopen the country, we can open the schools, too. We may need to limit class sizes and other things to decrease the likelihood of infection, but I realize that some kind of limited online learning may be necessary to some degree in the immediate future. I just want to make sure we’re all on the same page that this has to be temporary and as limited as possible.
LikeLike
Being all depends on what you mean by safe enough to reopen the country. Will it be safer to teach in the fall than it is now for all the people who are still working to provide care and food to those who shelter inside? Absolutely. Will it be as safe as teaching last fall? Absolutely not. The question is whether teaching is important enough to those teaching to bear the risk.
LikeLike
I wrote a bit about different metrics for when it would be safe to reopen schools and what schools might look like at that time here: https://gadflyonthewallblog.com/2020/04/18/you-cant-have-my-students-lives-to-restart-your-economy/
Basically, the minimum standard is to continue social distancing including school closures until cases peak and we see sustained declines in new cases for 14 days. That has not been met yet and there is no way of telling whether it will be met in the Fall. I’d rather do some less than excellent teaching and have fewer deaths than the opposite. We’ve got to let the science guide us.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
As a former special education teacher, I wonder and worry about the kids who are like the ones I used to teach. There is no way most of my kids would have been able to use online learning.
Not to mention the speech therapy, physical therapy, and occupational therapy that many of them needed.
LikeLike
Thanks, Zorba. That really is the untold story here. We’re steamrolling over special needs and poor kids to try and meet the needs of the most privileged.
LikeLike
The district in which I work announced today that MORE schools are going to “learn” using Summit. Sigh.
LikeLike
Sigh. This will probably be the new normal for a while at least. We just have to make sure it doesn’t stay longer than necessary.
LikeLike
[…] Source: The Internet is NOT the Best Place for Kids to Learn After the Coronavirus Pandemic | gadflyonthewal… […]
LikeLike
[…] high absences especially among poor, underprivileged and special needs children. Not to mention worries about the quality and depth of education provided virtually and the stress it places on […]
LikeLike
[…] When I teach my students over ZOOM, I rarely see parents guiding their kids through the […]
LikeLike
[…] Back in the pre-Coronavirus days when we still had in-person classes I used to come to school in a […]
LikeLike
[…] a semester of distance learning, I’d come back to school to return all the materials I had hastily marauded from my own filing […]
LikeLike
[…] in the pre-Coronavirus days when we still had in-person classes I used to come to school in a […]
LikeLike
[…] they will have to somehow try to continue their educations through all this madness – again. And this time it won’t merely be for the last quarter of the year. It will be at the start of a […]
LikeLike
[…] In any other year, having a teacher physically present in the classroom with a cohort of students is…. […]
LikeLike
[…] I’m not saying it would be perfect. On-line learning will never be as effective as in-person learning. […]
LikeLike
[…] There is significant evidence to back that up. However, this premise ignores the fact that invasive but necessary safety measures like wearing masks and practicing social distancing throughout the day will inevitably have negative effects on learning. […]
LikeLike
[…] This is less difficult for parents with higher socioeconomic status who have jobs that allow them to work from home. But for those who do not have such employment, it becomes almost impossible. […]
LikeLike
[…] be honest – both options pale in comparison to face-to-face instruction. But the kind of instruction students will receive in-person during this global pandemic will not […]
LikeLike
[…] I’m not a fan of virtual instruction. I’d rather teach students in-person. […]
LikeLike
[…] I know on-line teaching can never really hold a candle to in-person instruction. But that’s not an option right now. And pretending like reality is something different than it is will do no one any good. […]
LikeLike
[…] On the one hand, in-person learning is nearly always more effective than distance learning. […]
LikeLike
[…] In-person schooling IS preferable to remote instruction if everything else is equal. But everything else is not equal right now. […]
LikeLike
[…] In-person schooling IS preferable to remote instruction if everything else is equal. But everything else is not equal right now. […]
LikeLike
[…] In-person learning IS better under normal circumstances. But a global pandemic is not normal circumstances. […]
LikeLike
[…] just demonstrates the inferiority of cyber programs in general. The more interaction possible between teachers and students, the better. However, even at its best […]
LikeLike
[…] of the major takeaways of the last pandemic year was how ineffective and frustrating remote schooling is. Even under the best of circumstances in-person classes are far superior. […]
LikeLike
[…] this kind of cyber learning is developmentally inappropriate for most K-12 students – certainly those up through middle school. But with the proper parental support, most children […]
LikeLike
[…] year or at least we might revise them into policies that worked. In some instances – like cyber school – there seems to have been an attempt to accomplish this. In others – like standardized […]
LikeLike
[…] get me wrong. I hated teaching remotely on and off during the last few years. But safety is more important to me than being as effective as […]
LikeLike
[…] get me wrong. I hated teaching remotely on and off during the last few years. But safety is more important to me than being as effective as […]
LikeLike
[…] Nor do I think remote learning is the best way to teach. Under normal circumstances, in-person is much more effective. […]
LikeLike
[…] Much better to rely on teachers. […]
LikeLike
[…] Much better to rely on teachers. […]
LikeLike
[…] have to shift from embracing any technology as a given to being technologically literate. EdTech is like the Internet – a sewer. There’s way more garbage in there than treasure. If the district can’t control its own […]
LikeLike