Meet the New Boss.
Same as the Old Boss.
Arne Duncan is out. John King is in.
It’s the kind of tone deaf decision we’ve come to expect from President Barack Obama on education matters.
We’ve put up with 7 years of Duncan’s buffoonery as U.S. Secretary of Education: A man with no practical knowledge of the field. A corporate functionary. A drone. A mouthpiece for all the worst ideas of the 1% to sabotage public schools and replace them with charters.
And who does Obama replace him with!? Former New York State Chancellor King!? A man who was almost run out of his state on a rail!? A man with – admittedly – more experience than Duncan but all of the worst kind.
King resigned his NY position in the throes of terrible publicity for his and NY Board of Regents’ foolish approval of an obviously fraudulent charter school run by an obviously fraudulent con man. He ignored and dismissed parents at education forums, refused to fix an education system that he, himself, destroyed and was met with the largest opt out movement in the country. Oh. And that education experience I spoke of – he spent three years teaching in a “no excuses” charter school with a high suspension rate.
And now King’s the top policymaker in the nation for public schools.
It’s hard to imagine a worse choice. The Koch Brothers? Donald Trump? An inanimate carbon rod!?
Lest we forget, this is a decision made by Democrats – the supposed saviors of education.
Progressives have been howling against Obama’s test-and-punish education policies since early in his first term. And now when this liberal lion has an opportunity to show what he’s learned, to demonstrate that he’s taking our concerns seriously, his response is a middle finger salute.
It’s revealing politically.
The Presidential Primaries are only a handful of months away. If the Democrats really wanted to court educators, the party would have put pressure on Obama to make a pick teachers might actually be able to stomach. After all, whoever the President picks will only have a year in office – not long enough to make any major changes one way or another. But at least the Democrats could make a show of listening to an important voting block.
Instead the Democrats have demonstrated their true colors. They don’t care about schools, teachers, parents or students. They figure we have no where else to turn. We’re a gimme. They don’t have to concede anything. We’ll vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is.
I am only one man. I belong to a lot of education groups, but I am speaking only for myself here when I say this: MY VOTE IS NOT A SURE THING.
I will not vote for just any Democrat over any Republican. No, I don’t see any of the GOP candidates as being good for education. But most of the Democrats are the same or almost the same.
If the Democrats don’t give me a candidate I can believe in, I will not vote Democrat. I will vote third party. Heck! I’ll write in “John Dewey” before I’ll vote for a faux progressive Democrat like Obama.
I know what some people will say. This is a wasted vote. We have to keep a seat at the table. We need someone who maybe someday might possibly do something just a little bit helpful.
And that’s exactly why we’re in the predicament we are now. We can’t keep voting for the lesser of two evils, because at the end of the day, we’re still voting for evil.
I am so sick of politicians who smile to my face and stab me in the back. If I’m going to vote, it will be for someone I believe in, and if a Republican bent on destroying public education wins, at least he’ll have the decency to be honest about it.
NOTE: This article also was published in the LA Progressive.
Jill stein of the green party is your candidate
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really do like her, Alison. She is excellent on education issues, and actually seems willing to prove herself. She’s a real possibility. So is Bernie Sanders regardless of his Dem ties.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bernie talks the talk and might walk the walk if he could get past the Demo Party corporate toadies. Doubt that he can, and he has said he won’t run third party. I voted Jill Stein the last go round,very satisfying although a safe California vote. I hate the lesser of two evils scenario that we are seemingly eternally stuck with, but can’t even imagine voting Repub, so what’s a mother to do but vote one’s conscience. The oligarchs run the country anyway. See Chris Hedges for the likely end game. I wish public education, without the “Common Core”, standardized universal accountability testing insanity could be a unifying political effort. Unfortunately we’ll have to wait and see. Thanks for listening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am 100% with you on this Steve. I will not vote for a Dem just because….and certainly not for Hillary. Maybe Jill Stein…and if Jon Huntsman was running, probably would vote Rep for the first time in my long life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
i am backing sanders because of his positions on other issues. I have been reluctant to become a single issue voter but you may be right: John Dewy for President has a nice ring. He may get my vote in November!
LikeLike
Amen!
LikeLike
Get out to the primary and vote for Sanders, please. Clinton is the same type of corporate shill as two-faced Obama.
The primary voting is key; otherwise, it’s Clinton.
LikeLike
In the 1980’s, Democrats and labor leaders (Albert Shankara) bought into the false narrative that public schools were failing. This failing meme was fed by unsupported assertion, misleading international testing data and miserable graduation rates in too many communities. Almost none of the failing public education assertions were subjected to a professional peer review. If they had been, it would have quickly come to light that it was failing communities in abject poverty that made the schools look bad and often those schools were the only functional institution left in these failing communities. So, Bill Clinton led the charge for the AFT’s charter school ideas and for what has become standardized test and punish education policies.
Maybe not taking responsibility for grinding poverty in America made blaming everything on teachers and public education seductive, but it is destroying the foundation of American Democracy. So much so that in order to institute their hair brain education schemes, a political party name Democrats has actively fought to eliminate local school control through democratic process with their strong mayor schemes and federal control supervised by non-educators like Arne Duncan. Both the Democrats and the Republicans have lost their way. Democrats used to be for democracy and republicans used fight for local control. Now they are both working for corporate run for profit privatized education that eliminates the voice of parents in their children’s education.
LikeLike
[…] Reblogged from GADFLYONTHEWALLBLOG […]
LikeLike
The answer is NO. And here’s a 9-page essay detailing that answer. http://www.scribd.com/doc/106337306/THE-CHICAGO-PUBLIC-SCHOOLS-ALLERGIC-TO-ACTIVISM#scribd
LikeLike
[…] B. King was going to replace Duncan. Singer believes the choice simply continues the image that Democrats don’t really care much for public education. [Ed. note: Singer used a slightly more graphic term.] “We’ve put up with 7 years of […]
LikeLike
[…] and its buffoonish education secretary Arne Duncan. But now that Duncan is leaving, the President replaces him with John King – ex-New York State Commissioner of Education who enraged parents so much he was run out of […]
LikeLike
[…] swears they’re not going to take another drink. Then they hire the head of Anheuser-Busch (John King) as a nutritionist. And some of us still believe […]
LikeLike
[…] Neither candidate for the Democratic nomination for President has given an in-depth policy speech on K-12 education. […]
LikeLike
[…] Neither candidate for the Democratic nomination for President has given an in-depth policy speech on K-12 education. […]
LikeLike
[…] acting U.S. Secretary of Education is – himself – responsible for more attacks on public educators than almost anyone […]
LikeLike
[…] acting U.S. Secretary of Education is – himself – responsible for more attacks on public educators than almost anyone […]
LikeLike
[…] Another prolific blogger called the appointment of King a “tone deaf decision”, asking Do Democrats give a crap about education? […]
LikeLike
[…] was why I was upset. THIS was why I was writing angry blogs and pounding out my rage on […]
LikeLike
[…] industry to co-opt the largest and most well-funded Civil Rights organizations. Hence appointing John King to succeed Duncan as U.S. Secretary of Education – a brown face to silence racial […]
LikeLike
[…] industry to co-opt the largest and most well-funded Civil Rights organizations. Hence appointing John King to succeed Duncan as U.S. Secretary of Education – a brown face to silence racial […]
LikeLike
[…] presiding incumbent in this prestigious position, John King, somehow overcame that handicap. He had taught for three whole years at a charter school, but the […]
LikeLike
[…] not scared of her. We just fought off Arne Duncan and John King – two of the Democrats Ivy League privateers who actually knew what they were doing! If we can stop those jackholes from giving away community schools to rich corporations, we can […]
LikeLike
[…] there is no opposition party. The Democrats are almost as corrupt as the Republicans, and what’s more, they’re much weaker. […]
LikeLike
[…] We don’t need another Betsy Devos or Arne Duncan clone who just so happens to have taught at a regressive charter school. In fact, we already had that, too, in John King. […]
LikeLike
[…] got Barack Obama’s former education secretary John King who now serves as president and CEO of The Education Trust – itself an AstroTurf standardized […]
LikeLike
[…] “As the coronavirus pandemic evolves on a daily basis, it would be premature to issue blanket national waivers from core components of the law. Thus, case-by-case consideration of each state’s needs is, at this time, most appropriate,” said a letter signed by testing industry lobbyists including John King, the former secretary of education and head of the Education Trust. […]
LikeLike